TACKETT v. HESS

No. 86-156.

723 S.W.2d 833 (1987)

291 Ark. 239

Gary W. TACKETT, Appellant, v. Bob HESS, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Lane, Little Rock, for appellant.

Mark Stodola, City Atty., Little Rock, for appellees.


NEWBERN, Justice.

In this zoning case we are required to construe Little Rock city ordinances. The appellant, who was the plaintiff, complained that property in his neighborhood was improperly allowed planned unit development (PUD) status. He contends that the lot in question is too small for consideration as a PUD, and that if we agree we must find the action by the appellees in granting the PUD status is void because it constitutes an illegal exaction prohibited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases