ESTATE OF GOLD v. CITY OF PORTLAND

LUBA No. 86-102, CA A44142.

740 P.2d 812 (1987)

87 Or.App. 45

ESTATE OF Paul GOLD, Josephine Cohen, Hannah Davis, Ethel Gold and Jack Gold, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 12, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied October 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane Spies, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was Diane Spies & Associates, P.C., Portland.

Jeannette M. Launer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Kathryn Beaumont Imperati, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Portland's approval of the Tenth Amendment to its Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan.1 The Portland Development Commission (PDC), which is the city's urban renewal agency, submitted the proposed amendment to the city council. The ordinance approving the amendment includes petitioners' property in the urban renewal area and authorizes PDC to acquire it....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases