SUPREME CT. COMM. ON PROF. COND. v. MUHAMMED

No. 86-82.

723 S.W.2d 828 (1987)

291 Ark. 225

SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Petitioner, v. Wali MUHAMMED, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 16, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose Law Firm by Webster L. Hubbell & Jim Hunter Birch, Little Rock, for petitioner.

Wali Muhammed, pro se.


DUDLEY, Justice.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct filed an original action in this Court asking that the respondent, Wali Muhammed, be held in contempt of this Court for refusing to appear at a Committee hearing involving two complaints which had been filed against him. A Show Cause Order issued by this Court ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt. Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases