1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 740 P.2d
  5. 740 P.2d 806 (1987)
 

DENNEHY v. CITY OF PORTLAND

LUBA No. 86-098; CA A44018.

740 P.2d 806 (1987)

87 Or.App. 33

Thomas P. DENNEHY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 12, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory J. Howe, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Kathryn Beaumont Imperati, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Jeannette M. Launer, Legal Counsel for Portland Development Com'n.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's affirmance of the City of Portland's Tenth Amendment to its Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan.1 The area affected by the amendment is entirely within both the city and Multnomah County. The city council approved the amendment, but the county commission has not acted on it. The sole issue is whether LUBA erred by concluding that approval by the county governing body is unnecessary and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases