TUCKER v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO.

WCB No. 81-09929; CA A40271.

743 P.2d 761 (1987)

87 Or.App. 607

In the matter of the Compensation of Jack W. TUCKER, Claimant. Jack W. Tucker, Petitioner, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 7, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Swanson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Allan M. Muir, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were William H. Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board which reversed the referee and held that claimant's bilateral foot condition was not compensable as an occupational disease. ORS 656.802. We reverse.

Claimant worked for employer as a pressman for approximately 12 years, beginning in 1969. As part of his job, he stood on a vibrating steel platform three to six hours each work day. In December, 1980, he began to experience problems...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases