1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 743 P.2d
  5. 743 P.2d 738 (1987)
 

STATE v. BUFFINGTON

86-1739-C-3; CA A42931.

743 P.2d 738 (1987)

87 Or.App. 559

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Suzie BUFFINGTON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 7, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald K. Cue, Ashland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jens Schmidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before, WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1). She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The issue is whether the affidavit for the search warrant was sufficient. The material parts of the affidavit, made on May 30, 1986, by an Ashland police detective, are set out in the margin.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases