1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 823 F.2d
  5. 823 F.2d 644 (1987)
 

BRANDON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BD. OF PAROLE

No. 86-5268.

823 F.2d 644 (1987)

Roosevelt BRANDON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Echeverria (Appointed by this Court), with whom Peter A. Barnes, Washington, D.C., (Appointed by this Court) was on the brief for appellant.

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom James R. Murphy, Acting Corp. Counsel, at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee. John H. Suda, Acting Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellee.

Before MIKVA, EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

MIKVA, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Roosevelt Brandon claims that the delay of the District of Columbia Board of Parole (the Board) in granting his application for reparole violated his due process and equal protection rights. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted appellees' motion and dismissed Brandon's complaint. The court held that there was no basis for Brandon's due process claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases