PASHMAN v. CHEMTEX, INC.

No. 1265, Docket 87-7240.

825 F.2d 629 (1987)

Howard B. PASHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHEMTEX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided July 17, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Esterman, New York City (Gideon J. Karlick, Esterman & Esterman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Wayne A. Cross, New York City (Karen J. Pordum, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before OAKES, MESKILL, and PRATT, Circuit Judges.


GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from a grant of summary judgment against plaintiff Howard Pashman requires us to assess the meaning of "pretax profits", as used in Pashman's employment agreement with defendant Chemtex, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 701. This agreement called for Pashman to receive a "participation of ten [10] percent of the pretax profits on all sales made by" him. Because the meaning of this contract is clear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases