JAMES v. JAMES

86-35.

514 So.2d 939 (1987)

Velma Bama JAMES v. Matthew JAMES and Arminder J. Bailey.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Ramsey III, Dothan, for appellant.

Malcolm R. Newman of Newman & Newman, Dothan, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is reversed because of the lack of indispensable parties (the three persons alleged by the appellees to be the children of Charles William James, the deceased husband of the appellant). Rule 19(a), A.R.Civ.P. By our reversal, we are not to be understood as agreeing or disagreeing with the trial court's determination that Charles William James "had surviving children."

The cause is remanded for further proceedings. A determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases