1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 196 Cal.App.3d
  5. 196 Cal.App.3d 1243 (1987)
 

TARAKJIAN v. KRONE

Docket No. B023832.

196 Cal.App.3d 1243 (1987)

242 Cal. Rptr. 435

GARBIS TARAKJIAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GEORGE KRONE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

December 10, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Seymour I. Amster for Defendants and Appellants.

Rentzer & Rentzer for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

BOREN, J.

Appellant1 challenges the trial court's power to amend nunc pro tunc a default judgment entered against him. Appellant claims that the judgment being amended was void because it was rendered during the pendency of his bankruptcy, in violation of the automatic stay provisions of the federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C.A. § 362). From this, appellant concludes that the trial court had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases