1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 742 P.2d
  5. 742 P.2d 667 (1987)
 

CORNELL v. MERCK & CO.

A8512-08113; CA A41450.

742 P.2d 667 (1987)

87 Or.App. 373

Charles D. CORNELL, Appellant, v. MERCK & CO., Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and William B. Baer, M.D., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Sims, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Daniel W. Brandt, Portland.

Peter Livingston, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Merck & Co., Inc. With him on the brief were William P. Buren and Wood, Tatum, Mosser, Brooke & Landis, Portland.

Emil Berg, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Baer. With him on the brief was Hallmark, Griffith & Keating, P.C., Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his claims against two defendants, Baer and Merck. The trial court dismissed the medical malpractice claim against Baer on the Statute of Limitations. It dismissed the products liability claim against drug manufacturer Merck for failure to state a claim and also on limitations grounds.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries he suffered as a result of the use of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases