KARELITZ v. DAMSON OIL CORP.

No. 86-1816.

820 F.2d 529 (1987)

Stephen H. KARELITZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DAMSON OIL CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided June 5, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold E. Cohen, with whom Malcolm D. Finks, Englander, Englander & Finks, P.C., James F. Meehan, and Meehan, Boyle & Cohen, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

James S. Dittmar, with whom Richard R. Lavin and Widett, Slater & Goldman, P.C., Boston, Mass., were on brief, for defendant, appellee.

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BREYER and SELYA, Circuit Judges.


BREYER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant in this diversity case, Stephen Karelitz, a stockbroker, has sued the defendant-appellee, Damson Oil Corp., for a finder's fee that, he says, Damson Oil owes him because 1) Karelitz introduced Barrie Damson, the President of Damson Oil, to officials of Buttes Gas and Oil Co. in 1973, and 2) nine years later Damson Oil bought an important oil and gas property from Buttes. The basis for Karelitz's claim is a written contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases