1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 738 P.2d
  5. 738 P.2d 602 (1987)
 

IN THE MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF CRISLIP AND CRISLIP

D8505-63115; CA A41452.

738 P.2d 602 (1987)

86 Or.App. 146

In the matter of the Marriage of Penny L. CRISLIP, Appellant, AND Rodney L. Crislip, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 24, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Welch, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Welch and Koch, Portland.

Roger L. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Joshua Kadish, Portland, and Meyer, Habernigg & Wyse, Portland.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Wife appeals from the property division portions of the judgment in this dissolution case. She contends that the trial court erred by failing to award her one-half of the amount by which the value of husband's pension and related funds increased during the marriage.1 The court distinguished between the increased value attributable to new investment and that attributable to growth in pre-marital investment, ignored...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases