1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 735 P.2d
  5. 735 P.2d 600 (1987)
 

SHIRLEY v. FREUNSCHT

83-2886-J-2; A34619; S33343.

735 P.2d 600 (1987)

303 Or. 234

Robert D. SHIRLEY, Petitioner On Review, v. T. Daniel FREUNSCHT and New York Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Respondents On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 14, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Frye, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Frye & Veralrud, P.C., Eugene.

John F. Kilcullen, of Flinn, Brown & Roseta, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent on review T. Daniel Freunscht.

Patrick Ford, Medford, argued the cause for respondent on review New York Life Ins. Co.

GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a defamation case. The primary issue is whether defendants may introduce evidence of specific instances of plaintiff's allegedly improper conduct to demonstrate that his reputation was not damaged by the alleged defamation. The Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence was admissible under OEC 404 and 405. Shirley v. Freunscht, 81 Or.App. 221, 724 P.2d 907...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases