1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 190 Cal.App.3d
  5. 190 Cal.App.3d 1123 (1987)
 

BAKER v. RAMIREZ

Docket No. F005813.

190 Cal.App.3d 1123 (1987)

235 Cal. Rptr. 857

LELAND H. BAKER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PHILLIP D. RAMIREZ et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

April 1, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kimble, MacMichael & Upton and David Douglas Doyle for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Crowe, Crowe, Crowe & Williams, Crowe & Williams and Daniel W. Crowe for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Mary Kay Reynolds, John H. Ernster and Clay M. Smith for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

FRANSON, Acting P.J. —

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiff and respondent, Leland H. Baker, filed a complaint against defendants and appellants, Phillip D. Ramirez and Lydia G. Ramirez, to quiet title, for declaratory relief, for an injunction, and for damages based on appellant's removal of two rows of orange trees from a twenty-foot wide strip of property over which each claimed ownership. Appellants cross-complained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases