BOWMAN v. BOWMAN

No. 86-1693.

504 So.2d 808 (1987)

Susan J. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. Ted K. BOWMAN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Strickland of Livingston, Patterson & Strickland, Sarasota, for appellant.

Edwin T. Mulock and Lucinda Meekins Stathis of Law Office of Mulock & Birkhold, Bradenton, for appellee.


HALL, Judge.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases