HAMILTON v. NEPTUNE ORIENT LINES, LTD.

No. 85-2149.

811 F.2d 498 (1987)

Amos HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEPTUNE ORIENT LINES, LTD., Interocean Steamship Corporation, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees, and Crescent Wharf and Warehouse, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 25, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frances Pinnock, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert A. Mehaffey, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before SNEED, KENNEDY and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

Amos Hamilton appeals from the dismissal of his suit against Neptune Orient Lines and Interocean Steamship Corporation for want of prosecution. We conclude that although dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) is an appropriate means of ensuring the expeditious resolution of litigation, dismissal was improper in this case. We do so with some reluctance.

Hamilton alleged that he suffered a disabling injury while unloading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases