LINDQUIST v. WEBER

No. C3-86-1978.

404 N.W.2d 884 (1987)

Thomas R. LINDQUIST, et al., Appellants, v. Donald E. WEBER, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 26, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcus M. Baukol II, Willenbring, Lickteig & Dahl, Cold Spring, for appellants.

Robert D. Stoneburner, Stoneburner Law Office, Paynesville, for respondents.

Considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and PARKER and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Thomas and Kathryn Lindquist appeal from an amended judgment granting respondents Donald and Sharon Weber a prescriptive easement over their land. At issue is an access route used by respondents and their predecessors as a means of ingress to and egress from their cabin. Appellants claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding that usage of the access road was hostile for the required statutory period when portions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases