1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 188 Cal.App.3d
  5. 188 Cal.App.3d 1090 (1987)
 

YOUNG v. KEELE

Docket No. B019444.

188 Cal.App.3d 1090 (1987)

233 Cal. Rptr. 850

HARRY S. YOUNG et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MICHAEL L. KEELE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

January 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

David S. White, Rita M. Haeusler and Dern, Mason & Floum for Defendants and Appellants.

Michael J. Gurfinkel and Karno, Schwartz & Friedman for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

(1) The novel issue on this appeal is whether a judgment debtor at his judgment debtor's examination can refuse to answer questions related to settlement negotiations that occurred after the judgment.

On November 7, 1984, a judgment was entered against Michael L. Keele and Michael L. Keele Enterprises, Inc. (collectively Keele) for $484,000. The judgment was in favor of Harry S. Young, Jai...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases