PATCHOGUE-MEDFORD v. BD EDUC


70 N.Y.2d 57 (1987)

In the Matter of Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers, Respondent, v. Board of Education of the Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Sapir for appellants.

Daniel Galinson for respondent.

Norman H. Gross, Jay Worona and Mara B. Ginsberg for the New York State School Boards Association, amicus curiae.

Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General (Leonard Schaitman and Robert V. Zener of counsel), for United States, amicus curiae.

James R. Sandner, Janis Levart Barquist, John H. Jurgens and Katherine A. Levine for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae.

Minna J. Kotkin, Steven R. Shapiro and Richard Emery for the New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.

Judges KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur with Chief Judge WACHTLER; Judge SIMONS concurs in a separate opinion.


Chief Judge WACHTLER.

On this appeal we are asked to consider the constitutionality of a School District policy requiring all probationary teachers to submit to urinalysis to detect potential drug abuse. The courts below found that the practice constituted an illegal search and seizure in violation of the teachers' constitutional rights. The School District appeals.

In 1982 the Patchogue-Medford School...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases