ROY v. U.S.

No. 85-1300.

527 A.2d 742 (1987)

Phillip D. ROY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard K. Gilbert, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, for appellant.

Larry R. Parkinson, with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Judith Hetherton, Michael D. Brittin, and Suzanne G. Curt, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C. were on the brief, for appellee.

Before NEWMAN, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Roy challenges his conviction for possession of controlled substances. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress tangible evidence. The trial court, relying on Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), held the seizure lawful. We reverse.

Darrell Hudson called a security guard at the General Accounting Office and reported

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases