1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 404 N.W.2d
  5. 404 N.W.2d 853 (1987)
 

STATE v. RECIO-ARECIBIA

No. C8-86-1815.

404 N.W.2d 853 (1987)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Maximo RECIO-ARECIBIA, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Tom Foley, Ramsey Co. Atty., Steven C. DeCoster, Asst. Co. Atty., St. Paul, for appellant.

Salvador Rosas, Neighborhood Justice Center, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and WOZNIAK and STONE, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

STONE, Judge.

This appeal is from a pretrial order suppressing a statement made by the respondent during in-custody interrogation conducted through an interpreter. The State appeals, claiming suppression was erroneous and will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157, 159 (Minn.1977). We find no showing of critical impact and affirm the trial court.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases