We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LINDBACK, III v. LESKO
No. 87-9.
513 So.2d 718 (1987)
Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 22, 1987.
Rehearing Denied October 21, 1987.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kenneth H. Smith, Tavernier, for appellant.
Tittle & Tittle and Gus H. Crowell, Tavernier, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and JORGENSON, JJ.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
