HAUCKE v. OXFORD DEVELOPMENT

No. BN-374.

507 So.2d 712 (1987)

David L. HAUCKE, Appellant, v. OXFORD DEVELOPMENT and Home Insurance Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Sarasota, for appellant.

Claire L. Hamner and John J. O'Riorden of Dickinson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a workers' compensation order in which attorney fees were awarded appellant's counsel in the amount prescribed by the sliding fee schedule contained in Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes. Appellant challenges the order as defective, contending that proper findings of ultimate fact are not set forth. More specifically, appellant contends that the deputy commissioner's order must state that he considered all the relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases