SPENCER DEV. v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST.

No. 62134.

741 P.2d 477 (1987)

SPENCER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellees, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I-89, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fenton, Fenton, Smith, Reneau & Moon by Ronald L. Day, Oklahoma City, for Independent School District I-89.

Asst. Dist. Atty., Phyllis L. Walta, Oklahoma City, for Phillip White, County Superintendent of Schools.

Smith and Murdock by Gomer Smith, Jr. Oklahoma City, for Developer and Homeowners.

Howell & Webber by James B. Croy and James F. Howell Midwest City, for Independent School District I-52.


KAUGER, Justice.

The two questions presented on appeal are: 1) whether the trial court has authority to redraw a boundary line between two school districts; and 2) whether public policy estops the Oklahoma City School District from compelling the attendance in the Oklahoma City School District of pupils, who have attained de facto status as students in the Mid-Del School District. We find that the district court is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases