1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 416 N.W.2d
  5. 416 N.W.2d 795 (1987)
 

VACINEK v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF PINE CITY

No. C1-87-743.

416 N.W.2d 795 (1987)

Arthur J. VACINEK, et al., Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PINE CITY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry L. Blomquist, North Branch, for appellants.

Dwight Sherwood McKinnis Parker, Satrom, O'Neil, Lindberg and Sauter, Ltd., Cambridge, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LOMMEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants, Arthur and Barbara Vacinek, husband and wife, appeal from an order denying their motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The jury, by special verdict, found that respondent made a false representation to appellants but that the misrepresentation was unintentional. The trial court upheld the jury verdict and ordered judgment against the Vacineks on their action for intentional misrepresentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases