PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction after a jury trial for driving while intoxicated, 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(1). He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of his breath test and that the prosecutor committed reversible error by asking a leading and prejudicial question during examination of a witness. We disagree and affirm.
Defendant was the driver of a school bus in East Fairfield, and was charged with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
