SCHNEIDER v. BUCKMAN

No. C5-87-3.

412 N.W.2d 787 (1987)

Mark A. SCHNEIDER, Respondent, v. Harold BUCKMAN, individually and d/b/a Buckman-Schierts Ambulance Service, Appellant, Pam Buckman, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted December 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Moen, Dunlap, Keith, Finseth, Berndt, & Sandberg, Rochester, for Mark A. Schneider.

Robert C. Bell, Peterson, Bell, Converse & Jensen, St. Paul, for Harold Buckman individually and d/b/a Buckman-Schierts Ambulance Service.

Frederic N. Brown, Thomas P. Kelly, Brown & Bins, Rochester, for Pam Buckman.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Harold Buckman appeals from a judgment holding him responsible for all of Mark Schneider's damages, including those caused by the negligence of respondent Pam Laska (formerly Buckman).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

FACTS

On May 9, 1976, Mark Schneider was hang-gliding and fell about 250 feet. He sustained two broken ankles and fractured his spine. Schneider was transferred on a backboard by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases