VANCE-NELSON v. OWENS ILLINOIS

WCB 85-05286 & 84-13005; CA A41267.

745 P.2d 441 (1987)

88 Or.App. 472

In the matter of the Compensation of Victoria VANCE-NELSON, Claimant. Victoria Vance-Nelson, Petitioner, v. OWENS ILLINOIS and May Department Stores, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Nelson R. Hall and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Cecilia Lee, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Owens Illinois. With her on the brief were William H. Replogle, Ridgway K. Foley, P.C., and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Craig A. Staples, Portland, argued the cause for respondent May Department Stores. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Farmers Ins. Group v. SAIF, 301 Or. 612, 724 P.2d 799 (1986); International Paper Co. v. Wright, 80 Or.App. 444, 722 P.2d 57<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases