HIRSCHEY v. MENLOW

16-86-01630; CA A41904.

747 P.2d 402 (1987)

89 Or.App. 108

Glen HIRSCHEY, Lawrence Minturn, Clyde Pierce, Nathan Rubenstein, James Tapp, Terry Brant, George Dobson, Arthur Nance, William Coons, John Feuerbach, John Reiley, and John Hulsey, Appellants, v. William H. MENLOW, Ray Jones, Gerald E. Hawes, Leonard M. Jensen, and Lloyd Weeks, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Woods, Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Cass, Scott, Woods & Smith, Eugene.

Charles O. Porter, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN, J.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Because we conclude that the complaint states a claim under the federal statutes regulating electronic surveillance, we reverse and remand.

We assume that the facts pleaded in plaintiffs' complaint are true. Sommerfeldt v. Trammell, 74 Or.App. 183, 187,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases