LINDLEY v. NELSON

CC85-176; CA A42683.

747 P.2d 392 (1987)

89 Or.App. 149

Marion D. LINDLEY, Appellant, v. Norm NELSON, Jr., and Norm Nelson, Sr., Defendants, and Nelson Tire, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Gil Sharp, Hood River, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

James R. Foster, The Dalles, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief was Lewis, Foster & Peachey, The Dalles.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


YOUNG, Judge.

In this action for unpaid wages, plaintiff appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered in favor of defendant Nelson Tire, Inc. (Nelson Tire). The dispositive issue is whether there is any evidence that defendant Norm Nelson, Jr., (Junior) acted on behalf of Nelson Tire when he offered plaintiff 25 percent of the profit of Nelson Exhaust in addition to plaintiff's regular salary. We hold that there is sufficient evidence and reverse.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases