BREVIK v. KITE PAINTING, INC.

No. CX-86-1878.

416 N.W.2d 714 (1987)

Dennis BREVIK et al., Respondents, State of Minnesota, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. KITE PAINTING, INC., Petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 11, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Rotenberg, Minneapolis, for appellant.

David A. Singer, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Mark S. Anderson, St. Paul, for Minn. Chamber of Commerce & Industry, amicus curiae.

Kathleen Winters, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for intervenor.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals which reversed a lower court's order granting summary judgment for defendant Kite Painting, Inc. Plaintiff employees sued Kite, alleging that they were discharged from employment in retaliation for exercising statutory rights under the Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Act (MOSHA). Minn.Stat. ch. 182 (1984). The district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases