STATE v. DIMEO

84-1088; CA A40044.

734 P.2d 391 (1987)

84 Or. App. 491

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael Frank DIMEO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 25, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen A. Houze, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Birkland and Houze, Portland, and Sharon A. Williams, Portland.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). He contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of his telephone conversations with a police informant and the cocaine seized during a search of his car pursuant to a warrant.1 We affirm.

Officer Wade arrested John McEachern for possession and conspiracy to deliver...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases