Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment of conviction for burglary in the third degree, defendant argues that his motion to suppress statements made to the police, and evidence seized by them, should have been granted because he was detained in custody without probable cause at the time the statements were made and the evidence was seized (see, Dunaway v New York,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
