IN RE MINOLTA CAMERA PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Nos. B-86-613, B-86-2771, B-86-3070 and B-86-3072 to B-86-3105.

668 F.Supp. 456 (1987)

In re MINOLTA CAMERA PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

June 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig J. Hornig, Michael F. Brockmeyer, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Maryland, Carl Hisiro, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Pennsylvania, Illona Kirshon, Linda Gargiulo, Asst. Attys. Gen. of New York, for plaintiffs.

A. Paul Victor, Richard Taffet, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Donald E. Sharpe, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.


WALTER E. BLACK, Jr., District Judge.

Thirty-six states and the District of Columbia ("the States"), acting as parens patriae on behalf of their resident consumers, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15c(a)(1), initiated the instant antitrust actions. The States of New York and Maryland filed their Complaints on February 24, 1986, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania filed its Complaint on April 11, 1986. After the filing of these initial Complaints, extensive settlement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases