LUOTO v. LONG CREEK SCHOOL DIST. NO. 17

UP-16-86; CA A43584.

747 P.2d 370 (1987)

89 Or.App. 34

J.C. LUOTO and Long Creek Education Association, Respondents, v. LONG CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 17, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 23, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied February 12, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo Pope, Mt. Vernon, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Kilpatricks & Pope, Mt. Vernon.

Henry H. Drummonds, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Liana Colombo, Barbara J. Diamond and Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Colombo, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Long Creek School District No. 17 (district) petitions for review of ERB's order that, under district's collective bargaining agreement with the respondent association, it is required to submit to binding arbitration a grievance filed by the association on behalf of respondent Luoto, a discharged probationary teacher.1 The principal basis for the discharge was that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases