1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 188 Cal.App.3d
  5. 188 Cal.App.3d 927 (1987)
 

WORTHAM & VAN LIEW v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. D005116.

188 Cal.App.3d 927 (1987)

233 Cal. Rptr. 725

WORTHAM & VAN LIEW et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; B. DARRYL CLUBB, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lindley, Lazar & Scales, Michael H. Wexler and Richard C. Fridell for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Scott W. Sonne and Valentine S. Hoy VIII for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

TODD, J.

May the attorney for a partnership withhold from a partner important information received from another partner concerning partnership transactions claiming the information is confidential under the attorney-client privilege? We hold the joint-client rule of Evidence Code1 section 962 removes these communications from the protection of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases