Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, robbery in the third degree and arson in the third degree. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to each count, but particularly with respect to the arson count, where the evidence was wholly circumstantial. We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.