1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 354 S.E.2d
  5. 354 S.E.2d 757 (1987)
 

DIXON v. STUART

No. 8621SC1197.

354 S.E.2d 757 (1987)

Curtis E. DIXON v. Bryce A. STUART, Alexander R. Beaty and Sam H. Owen, Individually and In Their Capacities As Agents of the City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and the City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, a Municipal Corporation.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Steven Allen, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice by Anthony H. Brett, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

A complaint is deemed sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) where no insurmountable bar to recovery appears on the face of the complaint and the complaint's allegations give adequate notice of the nature and extent of the claim. Detailed fact pleading is not required. Deitz v. Jackson, 57 N.C. App. 275, 291 S.E.2d 282 (1982). A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases