Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to convict him of arson. The well-established test for the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and giving the People the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, the facts from which the inference of defendant's guilt is drawn are inconsistent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
