1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 190 Cal.App.3d
  5. 190 Cal.App.3d 895 (1987)
 

HENSLEY v. HENSLEY

Docket No. B020644.

190 Cal.App.3d 895 (1987)

235 Cal. Rptr. 684

JAMES F. HENSLEY, JR., as Executor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARY HENSLEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

March 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Siple & Orrock and Robert R. Anderson for Defendants and Appellants.

Richard L. Francis for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GILBERT, J.

Here's one for your "I don't believe it" file. Appellants, Gary and Cary Hensley, seek to reinstate a default judgment against them which had been set aside by the trial court. But, of course, there is a twist. They wish the reinstated judgment to reflect a damage award of zero. As we shall explain, appellants are not aggrieved and therefore cannot appeal the order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 902.) The appeal is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases