TOYOTA OF VISALIA, INC. v. NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BD.

Docket No. F006297.

188 Cal.App.3d 872 (1987)

233 Cal. Rptr. 708

TOYOTA OF VISALIA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BOARD et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

January 14, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Paul H. Dobson and Marybelle D. Archibald, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Coder & Tuel, Farley & Alldredge and Houston N. Tuel, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

BROWN (G.A.), P.J.

On petition of Toyota of Visalia, Inc. (Toyota)1 for a writ of administrative mandamus pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 section 1094.5, the superior court admitted certain exhibits in evidence and issued its writ directing the New Motor Vehicle Board (Board) to consider the newly admitted evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases