STUDEFIN v. TAXI & LIMO COMMN


135 Misc.2d 923 (1987)

Richard S. Studefin, Petitioner, v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

June 5, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S. Studefin, petitioner pro se. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Albert G. Fredericks of counsel), for respondents.


STANLEY PARNESS, J.

Petitioner, Richard S. Studefin, a taxi driver licensed by respondent, New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC), seeks an order pursuant to CPLR article 78 declaring null and void respondent's determination which found him guilty of violation of sections 203 (a) and 213 of the Taxi and Limousine Commission Rules and Regulations. Petitioner's separate motion to restore this proceeding to the calendar from which it had been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases