CONROY v. BOOK AUTOMATION, INC.

No. C6-86-940.

398 N.W.2d 657 (1987)

John A. CONROY, et al., Appellants, v. BOOK AUTOMATION, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 6, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Boyd, Paige J. Donnelly, Ltd., St. Paul, for appellants.

Charles N. Nauen, Opperman & Paquin, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

John and Janice Conroy, doing business as Conroy Enterprises, appeal denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial in a contract action. In response to special verdict questions, the jury found appellants breached a contract with Book Automation, Inc. The Conroys argue: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in limiting testimony of their former attorney; (2) errors of fundamental law and controlling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases