Order unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Respondent appeals from an order of Family Court finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree, by stealing bicycles from a bicycle shop. Respondent argues that the court erred at the suppression hearing under Family Court Act § 330.2 (1) in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that his statement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.