1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 398 N.W.2d
  5. 398 N.W.2d 650 (1987)
 

LUOMA v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C9-86-673.

398 N.W.2d 650 (1987)

James LUOMA, Petitioner, Appellant, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 18, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Nichols, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert Alfton, Minneapolis City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant James Luoma was convicted of D.W.I., Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (1984), and claims the trial court did not allow defense counsel to impeach the Intoxilyzer test results, the prosecutor committed misconduct in closing argument and that the trial court made prejudicial remarks and rulings during trial. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was stopped for speeding in Minneapolis and was subsequently arrested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases