FIRST STATE BANK OF RUSHMORE v. VAN RULER

No. C5-86-1206.

402 N.W.2d 637 (1987)

FIRST STATE BANK OF RUSHMORE, Respondent, v. Martin VAN RULER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 24, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence B. Hughes, Hedeen & Hughes, Worthington, for respondent.

George T. Qualley, Mendota Heights, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and LESLIE and RANDALL, JJ.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent First State Bank of Rushmore sued appellant Martin Van Ruler for non payment of promissory notes. Respondent moved for summary judgment. The trial court took the matter under advisement and gave the parties more time to furnish briefs.

In June 1985, appellant retained different counsel. In an order dated September 3, 1985, the trial court granted summary judgment to respondent, ordered respondent to submit a statement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases