IN RE AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION

Nos. 1084, 1110, 1111 and 1137, Dockets 85-6161, 85-6223, 85-6339 and 85-6341.

818 F.2d 210 (1987)

In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. Gerald HOGAN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company; Hercules Incorporated; Monsanto Company; T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc.; and Uniroyal, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Clara FRATICELLI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company; Hercules Incorporated; Monsanto Company; T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; the United States of America; and Ten Former Regents of the University of Hawaii, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided April 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Taylor, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Wayne M. Mansulla and Ashcraft & Gerel, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert C. Longstreth, Trial Atty., Torts Branch, Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. Atty. E.D.N.Y., and Joan M. Bernott, Sp. Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant-appellee U.S.

John C. Sabetta, New York City (Townley & Updike, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Monsanto Co.

Leonard L. Rivkin, Garden City, N.Y. (Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, Garden City, N.Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellee The Dow Chemical Co.

Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii (Corinne K.A. Watanabe, Atty. Gen., State of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, of Counsel), for defendants-appellees Regents of the University of Hawaii.

Clark, Gagliardi & Miller, White Plains, N.Y., on the brief, for defendant-appellee T H Agriculture & Nutrition Co., Inc.

Shea & Gould, New York City, on the brief, for defendant-appellee Uniroyal, Inc.

Kelley Drye & Warren, New York City, on the brief, for defendant-appellee Hercules Inc.

Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, WINTER and MINER, Circuit Judges.


VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:

The above captioned appeals raise a number of issues distinct from that of causal relation, the dominant issue in most Agent Orange cases, and will be disposed of largely on the basis of those unrelated issues. The appeals are from a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2) and from summary judgments, granted by Chief Judge Weinstein of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in opinions reported at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases