1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 402 N.W.2d
  5. 402 N.W.2d 605 (1987)
 

HINK v. IMPERIAL CAS. AND INDEM. CO.

No. C0-86-1985.

402 N.W.2d 605 (1987)

Ronald HINK, Appellant, v. IMPERIAL CASUALTY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 24, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Wurst, Wurst, McDowell & Ihle, Ltd., Thief River Falls, for appellant.

Jeffrey M. Bauer, Foster, Waldeck & Lind, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and SEDGWICK and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment determining respondent insurer owes no duty to defend appellant in an action for damages arising from the application of chemicals. Appellant claims the trial court erred in concluding a policy exclusion prevents coverage because the exclusion either (1) does not relieve the insurer's obligation to defend a negligence claim or (2) renders the policy a nullity. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases