Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
We find unpersuasive the petitioners' contention that the DEC lacked authority to hold a map-amendment hearing to reclassify the subject property from the status of an "adjacent area" to that of land which was "formerly connected [to] tidal wetlands" (see, 6 NYCRR 661.4 [b] [1]; [hh] [6]). The Tidal Wetlands Act (ECL art 25) expressly authorizes the amendment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.